FILM: What
percentage of a crew for a major film is female? Hint: it is not high.
BASEBALL: An
argument for a mid-season title game in baseball. I am not sure American
fans will take to a title game that is not the main event. On the other hand (association)
football fans get somewhat excited about minor trophies.
FOOTBALL: How
unlikely an event was Germany’s 7-1 World Cup semi-final win against Brazil?
This article
also tries to translate the result to comparable results for other sports.
ART/ECONOMICS/MUSIC: Why
Taylor Swift is wrong about the value of music albums in the internet age. And
a follow-up article
applying the arguments to other forms of art and media.
WOMEN: The
19 hottest redheads of all time. Just ‘cause.
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Sunday, July 27, 2014
AFL Power Rankings: Round 18 2014
RISING UP
Adelaide continues its late-season surge up the rankings (and the premiership ladder), even edging out its hated co-tenants the Power by .005 ranking points to take fourth spot. That’s right – the Crows may have only just edged into the eight on the ladder, but they are considered one of the top four teams here (just). This is their highest spot on the rankings since the end of 2012, when they made the preliminary final. In 2013 they had less ‘very good’ results, and more ‘fair’ results and so became average again. This year? On current ratings, they have had three ‘very good’ results, including two in the past four weeks. This is not yet back to 2012 standards, and in fact they would not even be in the top eight of that year on their current ranking points. However in a year where there is now a steep drop in quality after the top two it is enough to get them back above the average mark.
FALLING DOWN
Remember a couple of years ago when the Gold Coast Suns, amidst all their thrashings, had a couple of close losses when Gary Ablett was missing, and some media commentators asked whether they played better without him? Of course those people should have been laughed off the screen, but Ablett’s absence really looks to be hurting now, with the Suns slumping to 0-7 without the G.O.A.T. on the weekend. Worse, the team they got thumped by were their lowly cross-state rivals the Brisbane Lions, meaning the Suns have now fallen from ninth to thirteenth in the rankings in the space of a couple of weeks. Mention should also be made here of the Fremantle Dockers, who were Belo Horizonted by the worst team in the competition, namely St. Kilda, and who were only saved from an ignominious drop in the rankings because the teams directly below them struggled as well.
ALSO OF NOTE
In the face-off between the two best teams Hawthorn beat Sydney at the MCG, but just missed out on taking back top spot on the AFL ladder, and they miss out on taking back the top spot on the rankings as well. A ten-point win in Melbourne to the Hawks, once home ground advantage is adjusted for, means that both teams get about the same number of ranking points from the match. Also not helping the Hawks make up ground were the downward adjustments in ratings of some of their recent opponents, in particular the aforementioned Suns.
Adelaide continues its late-season surge up the rankings (and the premiership ladder), even edging out its hated co-tenants the Power by .005 ranking points to take fourth spot. That’s right – the Crows may have only just edged into the eight on the ladder, but they are considered one of the top four teams here (just). This is their highest spot on the rankings since the end of 2012, when they made the preliminary final. In 2013 they had less ‘very good’ results, and more ‘fair’ results and so became average again. This year? On current ratings, they have had three ‘very good’ results, including two in the past four weeks. This is not yet back to 2012 standards, and in fact they would not even be in the top eight of that year on their current ranking points. However in a year where there is now a steep drop in quality after the top two it is enough to get them back above the average mark.
FALLING DOWN
Remember a couple of years ago when the Gold Coast Suns, amidst all their thrashings, had a couple of close losses when Gary Ablett was missing, and some media commentators asked whether they played better without him? Of course those people should have been laughed off the screen, but Ablett’s absence really looks to be hurting now, with the Suns slumping to 0-7 without the G.O.A.T. on the weekend. Worse, the team they got thumped by were their lowly cross-state rivals the Brisbane Lions, meaning the Suns have now fallen from ninth to thirteenth in the rankings in the space of a couple of weeks. Mention should also be made here of the Fremantle Dockers, who were Belo Horizonted by the worst team in the competition, namely St. Kilda, and who were only saved from an ignominious drop in the rankings because the teams directly below them struggled as well.
ALSO OF NOTE
In the face-off between the two best teams Hawthorn beat Sydney at the MCG, but just missed out on taking back top spot on the AFL ladder, and they miss out on taking back the top spot on the rankings as well. A ten-point win in Melbourne to the Hawks, once home ground advantage is adjusted for, means that both teams get about the same number of ranking points from the match. Also not helping the Hawks make up ground were the downward adjustments in ratings of some of their recent opponents, in particular the aforementioned Suns.
Wednesday, July 23, 2014
‘Velvet’, And More Words About The Portrayal of Women in Comic Books
The choice of age for Velvet Templeton does help the title stand out, visually and narratively. Writer Ed Brubaker has said in an interview for ‘Wired’ that some of the advantages of choosing ‘a mature, middle-aged woman’ was that she could have ‘a secret history’, and she is ‘someone who’s lived a real life’. This does indeed give the character a depth that might be lacking in a young or rookie agent; dangers lie not only in Velvet’s present, but may emerge from her past as well. Steve Epting’s workmanlike art – in a good sense – also helps to diffuse the focus away from Velvet’s sexuality and place it upon the plot. In that way, it is almost the antithesis of something like former Image spy series J. Scott Campbell’s ‘Danger Girl’, and even TV series like ‘La Femme Nikita’ to some extent.
However, there are still some things that might make people longing for empowered female characters bristle a bit. In one scene in issue #3, Velvet’s only way of gaining some important information is to have sex with one of the men who have access to it. Now she is hardly alone in using this tactic, and compared to the number of times that, say, Sydney Bristow seduced men in ‘Alias’ it is relatively minor. Other potential mitigating factors are that Velvet is able to exercise some measure of control in picking her target – spurning a fat, bald ministry officer for his more attractive assistant – and that perhaps it is part of the point that, unfortunately, this was the primary way for a female secret agent in the 1970s to be effective. Nevertheless, some might wish that the story had not resorted to this fairly ‘simple’ method for moving the story forward.
In addition, in terms of the Bechdel test, the series almost fails completely. Most of Velvet’s friends and acquaintances are men, and she seems to have gone through a few male companions in her time. The only other even semi-substantial female character that shows up in the ‘present-day’ story is the wife of a general Velvet is targeting, whose main fixation turns out to be her husband and who is quickly swept aside. This absence of women is partly forgivable – realistically, a lot of the people in Velvet’s world would be men – particularly in the era the story is set in. The series also redeems itself on this aspect to some extent through its flashbacks in issue #5 to Velvet’s tutelage from Lady Pauline, a war hero that provides both an inspiration and a cautionary tale to the young agent.
Still, I think it would be an overly curmudgeonly reader that would hold these potential shortcomings against the series. All in all ‘Velvet’ is for the most part an intelligent and intriguing read, and a refreshing change from portrayals of women in comics like this. Alas, in the same ‘Wired’ interview, Brubaker recounted how when he pitched the series as a TV pilot, notes came back insisting that the main character be 25 years old. Kudos to Brubaker then for sticking to his (metaphorical) guns on that count, and for having brought a little more balance to the types of characters and genres available to comic book audiences.
Velvet #6, which begins the second storyline, is out this week.
Sunday, July 20, 2014
The Wooden Finger Five – July 2014
Well, it has been a long, circuitous
route through punk, post-punk, prog rock, Britpop, American indie, Christmas
songs, and Eurovision, but the Wooden Finger Depot’s musical ears have finally
caught up with the present day again. Note also the numerical order of this
month’s five tracks – yes, the order is deliberate; we’re doing a countdown
here.
No. 5 Dogs – Sun Kil Moon
47 year old Mark Kozelek’s most recent Sun Kil Moon album, ‘Benji’, talks a bit about death and getting old. ‘Dogs’ however sets its sights backwards, recounting the first girl Kozelek kissed, the first girl he loved, the first girl he fumbled around with, and well … you get the picture. (The ‘Dogs’ title by the way refers to the Pink Floyd track of the same name and Kozelek ‘panting like a dog’ with lust, rather than being any comment on the girls themselves – I think.) Double-tracked vocals are employed fairly regularly throughout ‘Benji’ but they are used to best effect here; like ghosts of past Kozeleks have arisen to help the current day man remember his formative sexual and romantic experiences, and speculate on how they have affected him.
No. 4 Broke – Tom Vek
London’s Tom Vek’s new album ‘Luck’ is OK, but some of the vocals and sounds can seem a little insubstantial at points, as if there was not the budget for some real studio time. Not so on ‘Broke’, on which Vek throws some sizable beats and multiple instruments behind his fullest vocal on the LP. Strangely, it reminds me of Big Black’s ‘Kerosene’ and its memorable ‘dinga-da-dinga’ guitar intro but it is far less harrowing than that track (most things in this world are). I am still not sure what the Middle Eastern-sounding instrument is; in the end I settled on just plain old guitar.
No. 3 Spook
– Adult Jazz
Upon first hearing it, I wondered if Adult Jazz’s ‘Spook’ was not a single but an EP, as it seemed to stretch on for 15-20 minutes (it actually goes for ten). The haunting movement of the track (wow, I used the adjective ‘haunting’ to describe a song called ‘Spook’ … lazy) make the lyrics feel like poetry, if that poem was something akin to an early 21st century college version of T.S. Eliot’s ‘The Waste Land’. Further examination reveals that those lyrics are not quite as profound as ‘April is the cruellest month, breeding’ or ‘I had not thought death had undone so many’; instead they are lines like – I think – ‘spook at the door, I spoke with a whisper’, ‘bow down on me’, ‘and I do not take it lightly’, ‘I was always poking around the suburbs with a heart of glass’ and ‘with your weak words, and your weaker will’. Still what standards am I holding Adult Jazz up to here? This beautiful track is itself a fine achievement.
No. 2 Premonitions – Vaults
Listening to London band Vaults’ first single ‘Premonitions’, you will definitely feel as if you have heard something like it before. That would be the case even if the melody to the line ‘But we never look back’ did not sound very close to that of the line ‘And I’m so down caught in the middle’ from London Grammar’s ‘Strong’. Nevertheless, even amongst chanteuse-led, bar lounge pop it stands out as something special. For example, ‘Strong’ kept pretty much the same dynamics all the way through, but in ‘Premonitions’ – just when you think that you have heard all it has to offer – suddenly some strings drift in and seem to boost the tune upwards through its final forty seconds. On a scale of 10pm to 4am, it comes in at about 1.30.
No. 1 Bamboo – Deers
Two young, shaggy-haired brunette girls from Madrid mixing Californian surf rock with the ramshackle fuzz of the Velvet Underground? Dios mio!! it’s hipster heaven! (On your bikes Haim.) Their track ‘Bamboo’ is not just all about cool, cool style though; it is a vocally intriguing song in which the duo bounce hoarse, laconic phrases off each other, each of their voices distinct but blending with the other. Think of a rougher, multitracked version of Best Coast. Here’s hoping las mujeres can chuck together more stuff as appealing as this.
No. 5 Dogs – Sun Kil Moon
47 year old Mark Kozelek’s most recent Sun Kil Moon album, ‘Benji’, talks a bit about death and getting old. ‘Dogs’ however sets its sights backwards, recounting the first girl Kozelek kissed, the first girl he loved, the first girl he fumbled around with, and well … you get the picture. (The ‘Dogs’ title by the way refers to the Pink Floyd track of the same name and Kozelek ‘panting like a dog’ with lust, rather than being any comment on the girls themselves – I think.) Double-tracked vocals are employed fairly regularly throughout ‘Benji’ but they are used to best effect here; like ghosts of past Kozeleks have arisen to help the current day man remember his formative sexual and romantic experiences, and speculate on how they have affected him.
No. 4 Broke – Tom Vek
London’s Tom Vek’s new album ‘Luck’ is OK, but some of the vocals and sounds can seem a little insubstantial at points, as if there was not the budget for some real studio time. Not so on ‘Broke’, on which Vek throws some sizable beats and multiple instruments behind his fullest vocal on the LP. Strangely, it reminds me of Big Black’s ‘Kerosene’ and its memorable ‘dinga-da-dinga’ guitar intro but it is far less harrowing than that track (most things in this world are). I am still not sure what the Middle Eastern-sounding instrument is; in the end I settled on just plain old guitar.
Upon first hearing it, I wondered if Adult Jazz’s ‘Spook’ was not a single but an EP, as it seemed to stretch on for 15-20 minutes (it actually goes for ten). The haunting movement of the track (wow, I used the adjective ‘haunting’ to describe a song called ‘Spook’ … lazy) make the lyrics feel like poetry, if that poem was something akin to an early 21st century college version of T.S. Eliot’s ‘The Waste Land’. Further examination reveals that those lyrics are not quite as profound as ‘April is the cruellest month, breeding’ or ‘I had not thought death had undone so many’; instead they are lines like – I think – ‘spook at the door, I spoke with a whisper’, ‘bow down on me’, ‘and I do not take it lightly’, ‘I was always poking around the suburbs with a heart of glass’ and ‘with your weak words, and your weaker will’. Still what standards am I holding Adult Jazz up to here? This beautiful track is itself a fine achievement.
No. 2 Premonitions – Vaults
Listening to London band Vaults’ first single ‘Premonitions’, you will definitely feel as if you have heard something like it before. That would be the case even if the melody to the line ‘But we never look back’ did not sound very close to that of the line ‘And I’m so down caught in the middle’ from London Grammar’s ‘Strong’. Nevertheless, even amongst chanteuse-led, bar lounge pop it stands out as something special. For example, ‘Strong’ kept pretty much the same dynamics all the way through, but in ‘Premonitions’ – just when you think that you have heard all it has to offer – suddenly some strings drift in and seem to boost the tune upwards through its final forty seconds. On a scale of 10pm to 4am, it comes in at about 1.30.
No. 1 Bamboo – Deers
Two young, shaggy-haired brunette girls from Madrid mixing Californian surf rock with the ramshackle fuzz of the Velvet Underground? Dios mio!! it’s hipster heaven! (On your bikes Haim.) Their track ‘Bamboo’ is not just all about cool, cool style though; it is a vocally intriguing song in which the duo bounce hoarse, laconic phrases off each other, each of their voices distinct but blending with the other. Think of a rougher, multitracked version of Best Coast. Here’s hoping las mujeres can chuck together more stuff as appealing as this.
Saturday, July 19, 2014
Who Has Ended Up With The Easiest AFL Draw in 2014?
With a split round in the AFL I am not posting any updated
AFL Power Rankings this week. To fill the gap though I thought it might be
interesting to revisit which AFL team has had the easiest draw in 2014. At the
start of the 2012,
2013,
and 2014
seasons I have rated the difficulty of each team’s draw, based on the ranking
of teams at the end of the previous year. But something I should have done
before is gone back and re-calculated the results based on how strong teams
turned out to be. Fortunately I had the foresight this year in designing my
Excel file to make it simple to do this.
Basically, the difficulty of a team’s draw depends on three factors:
- The effect of not playing themselves. For example, Sydney’s draw becomes easier relative to every other team simply because they do not have to play Sydney. If you do not believe this should be taken into account, just subtract this effect from the results.
- Net home ground advantage. This is simply the net effect of the adjustments I make for home ground advantage across the season. It is not always zero, particularly if you are a team with a tendency to ‘sell’ home games interstate.
- The teams played twice. Obviously if you play harder teams twice rather than once, your draw becomes harder.
At the start of the 2014 season, based on the end-of-year 2013 rankings, these were the results (higher score means easier draw):
However, if I recalculate the results based on teams’ rankings at the end of Round 17 2014, this is what I get:
Basically, the difficulty of a team’s draw depends on three factors:
- The effect of not playing themselves. For example, Sydney’s draw becomes easier relative to every other team simply because they do not have to play Sydney. If you do not believe this should be taken into account, just subtract this effect from the results.
- Net home ground advantage. This is simply the net effect of the adjustments I make for home ground advantage across the season. It is not always zero, particularly if you are a team with a tendency to ‘sell’ home games interstate.
- The teams played twice. Obviously if you play harder teams twice rather than once, your draw becomes harder.
At the start of the 2014 season, based on the end-of-year 2013 rankings, these were the results (higher score means easier draw):
However, if I recalculate the results based on teams’ rankings at the end of Round 17 2014, this is what I get:
(Those who really pay attention to the rankings will notice
that the effect of not playing your own team is slightly different to the
reverse of the team’s ranking points as of Round 17. I have adjusted each
team’s ranking so that the sum of ranking points across teams is zero; normally
the sum of ranking points across teams is slightly negative.)
The Gold Coast Suns are now assessed to have the easiest draw in 2014. Part of this is because they have somewhat improved in 2014, so it is more of an advantage to them not to have to play themselves. More important though is that two of the teams they play twice, Brisbane and St. Kilda, are the two teams whose ranking points have deteriorated the most so far in 2014. Sure, this means that the Lions and the Saints have just gone from bad to atrocious. But at the start of the season the Lions were rated more highly than Gold Coast, and the Saints were considered by the rankings as likely to beat the Suns in Melbourne, so the drop-offs of those teams are still significant.
Richmond is still rated as having the second easiest draw, and its draw is only really considered worse than it was at the start of the year because the Tigers themselves have gone backwards. (As a Tigers supporter I am going to go hit a brick wall now…)
Adelaide, North Melbourne, and West Coast are all still considered to have relatively easy draws. The Bulldogs are also still considered to have a relatively easy draw, but significantly less easy than it was considered to be at the start of the year. Four of the five teams that the Dogs play twice this year – Melbourne, GWS, Essendon, and Gold Coast – are much more highly rated than they were at the end of 2013, particularly Melbourne and GWS. However in contrast to Gold Coast, that may not have affected the Bulldogs’ win-loss record that much; Melbourne and GWS have gone from horrible to not as bad but the Dogs would still be favourites against them.
At the other end of the scale, cellar dwellers St. Kilda, Brisbane, and GWS pay dearly for not being able to play themselves although Brisbane also plays some tough teams twice. Hawthorn though looks to have the most difficult return bouts. At the start of the year Geelong was rated as having the most difficult second engagements, but two of their opponents – Brisbane and Carlton – have dropped off significantly so far in 2014. Meanwhile Essendon’s draw is not as bad as it first seemed as, aside from its own improvement, the other ‘Big 4’ Victorian clubs that it plays twice have all taken a step back.
In general though, the fixtures for most clubs have turned out to be of about the same level of difficulty as they were assessed to be at the start of the season. This is because, with some notable exceptions, most clubs have played at pretty much the same level so far in 2014 as they did in 2013. Now excuse me as I resume hitting a brick wall at the thought of Richmond blowing the best draw they will have in years.
The Gold Coast Suns are now assessed to have the easiest draw in 2014. Part of this is because they have somewhat improved in 2014, so it is more of an advantage to them not to have to play themselves. More important though is that two of the teams they play twice, Brisbane and St. Kilda, are the two teams whose ranking points have deteriorated the most so far in 2014. Sure, this means that the Lions and the Saints have just gone from bad to atrocious. But at the start of the season the Lions were rated more highly than Gold Coast, and the Saints were considered by the rankings as likely to beat the Suns in Melbourne, so the drop-offs of those teams are still significant.
Richmond is still rated as having the second easiest draw, and its draw is only really considered worse than it was at the start of the year because the Tigers themselves have gone backwards. (As a Tigers supporter I am going to go hit a brick wall now…)
Adelaide, North Melbourne, and West Coast are all still considered to have relatively easy draws. The Bulldogs are also still considered to have a relatively easy draw, but significantly less easy than it was considered to be at the start of the year. Four of the five teams that the Dogs play twice this year – Melbourne, GWS, Essendon, and Gold Coast – are much more highly rated than they were at the end of 2013, particularly Melbourne and GWS. However in contrast to Gold Coast, that may not have affected the Bulldogs’ win-loss record that much; Melbourne and GWS have gone from horrible to not as bad but the Dogs would still be favourites against them.
At the other end of the scale, cellar dwellers St. Kilda, Brisbane, and GWS pay dearly for not being able to play themselves although Brisbane also plays some tough teams twice. Hawthorn though looks to have the most difficult return bouts. At the start of the year Geelong was rated as having the most difficult second engagements, but two of their opponents – Brisbane and Carlton – have dropped off significantly so far in 2014. Meanwhile Essendon’s draw is not as bad as it first seemed as, aside from its own improvement, the other ‘Big 4’ Victorian clubs that it plays twice have all taken a step back.
In general though, the fixtures for most clubs have turned out to be of about the same level of difficulty as they were assessed to be at the start of the season. This is because, with some notable exceptions, most clubs have played at pretty much the same level so far in 2014 as they did in 2013. Now excuse me as I resume hitting a brick wall at the thought of Richmond blowing the best draw they will have in years.
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
We Interrupt Our Regularly Scheduled Blog For This Basketball Assessment
With the return of former Miami Heat forward LeBron James to
the Cleveland Cavaliers, Vegas have installed the Cavs as the new
favourites to win the 2014-15 NBA title. Hold on a moment though – the
return of the Cavs’ all-time leading scorer and four-time NBA Most Valuable
Player is certainly cause for optimism, but should they really be favourites?
As Nate Silver has pointed out reasonable estimates of LeBron’s value put him as being worth 20 wins per regular season. The Cavs won 33 games in 2013-14 (see LHS of the chart below), and Silver estimates the addition of LeBron would likely take them up to around 52 wins. This will probably make Kyrie Irving and the rest of C-Town somewhat happier (see middle of chart). But it is unlikely to take them to a level where they can match it with top teams such as the mighty San Antonio Spurs (see RHS of chart).
The other notable new addition to the Cavs, No. 1 draft pick Andrew Wiggins, might be a handy asset to have, but rookies rarely add a lot of value. Even Rookie of the Year winners James and Oklahoma City star Kevin Durant threw up a lot of bricks in their first seasons and their teams had mediocre records.
As Nate Silver has pointed out reasonable estimates of LeBron’s value put him as being worth 20 wins per regular season. The Cavs won 33 games in 2013-14 (see LHS of the chart below), and Silver estimates the addition of LeBron would likely take them up to around 52 wins. This will probably make Kyrie Irving and the rest of C-Town somewhat happier (see middle of chart). But it is unlikely to take them to a level where they can match it with top teams such as the mighty San Antonio Spurs (see RHS of chart).
The other notable new addition to the Cavs, No. 1 draft pick Andrew Wiggins, might be a handy asset to have, but rookies rarely add a lot of value. Even Rookie of the Year winners James and Oklahoma City star Kevin Durant threw up a lot of bricks in their first seasons and their teams had mediocre records.
The Vegas odds may reflect that people now think that there
is a good chance that the Cavs will land Minnesota’s rebounding machine Kevin
Love. Depending on what the Cavs gave up for him Love
could add over another 15 wins to the team, and take their win column up
into the high 60s. Of course the Cavs have been in that realm before and not
come home with the trophy, but they would probably deserve favouritism at
least.
Regardless, the Cavs are probably going to be a
lot better than James’ old team the Miami Heat. Essentially the Cavs and Heat
would be expected to swap win-loss records, with James’ production of 20 wins
being transferred from Florida to Ohio. Even with their recent signings and a
terrible Eastern Conference the Heat may struggle to make the playoffs.
Silver argued, as did these ESPN scribes, that James would have had a much better shot at a title if he had managed to get to the Los Angeles Clippers, where he could have teamed up with stars Chris Paul and Blake Griffin. As it is the Cavs may still find it tough to get past the Indiana Pacers (assuming they keep free agent Lance Stephenson) and the Chicago Bulls if the injured Derrick Rose can become productive again.
Silver argued, as did these ESPN scribes, that James would have had a much better shot at a title if he had managed to get to the Los Angeles Clippers, where he could have teamed up with stars Chris Paul and Blake Griffin. As it is the Cavs may still find it tough to get past the Indiana Pacers (assuming they keep free agent Lance Stephenson) and the Chicago Bulls if the injured Derrick Rose can become productive again.
Remember when Chris Judd left the West Coast Eagles and
there was that blog post about the
song he might write about moving back to Melbourne? No? Well, I still like
to think that as LeBron James drives his Ferrari on the northbound out of Miami
that he might be singing the lyrics below to the tune of ‘Miami’
by Foals. Yes, I know that even if LeBron was inclined to change lyrics to
Miami-themed songs – which he wouldn’t I expect – that he would be more likely
to choose the track of the same name by Will Smith. Like millions of other
sports fans, I am projecting on to an athlete something that is happening in my
imagination only.
I promised you rings, not two, three, or
four
Not five, six, or seven, or even more
But why did the fans boo when I stepped on
the floor?
Would you be there, cheering, stay in your
seat?
(In Miami)
How could I say no to someone like Pat
Riley?
(In Miami)
After two titles though things aren’t the
same
I’m playing with the remains of Dwyane Wade
No wonder the Spurs just brushed us away
Now what’s the best place to go chase ring
number three?
(Not Miami)
It’s the place where my hometown entourage
will be
(Not Miami)
(Miami bad, Miami bad, Miami bad, Miami bad)
(Miami bad, Miami bad, Miami bad, Miami bad)
…
Before we vamos:
·
The James/Wade/Bosh era in Miami will be mainly
remembered by me for two things: the Welcome
Party, and Game
6 of the 2012-13 Finals.
·
But here are some
other moments to remember from basketball’s most famous, divisive,
Drake-loving team of the past decade.
·
What if every other NBA player pulled a LeBron
and went
back to their hometown?
·
And one more link: here are some reasons why LBJ
might have chosen Cleveland instead.
Sunday, July 13, 2014
AFL Power Rankings: Round 17 2014
RISING UP
The Sydney Swans won their twelfth game in a row on Saturday night, giving them their equal longest winning streak ever, and easily their longest since the ‘Foreign Legion’ was decimating teams out at the Lake Oval in the 1930s. More importantly, I am sure, they are now the number one ranked team! As mentioned last week the Swans do not have the best average net margin in the league over their past 22 games, though it was boosted somewhat by showing Carlton who their daddy was on the weekend. But Sydney’s recent form shines – their net margin over the first 10 of those games was a mediocre -8; over their past 12 games: +42.
FALLING DOWN
Collingwood fans are now starting to worry that their team will miss the finals, and the rankings now show that the Pies are outside the eight best teams. This is not unprecedented in the four-year history of these rankings – Collingwood slipped to ninth in Round 14 last year – but it is a rarity. They have now lost over two goals worth of ranking points in the past five weeks. What may end up saving the Carringbush from an early off-season is that the team mentioned below looks like they could be in trouble as well.
ALSO OF NOTE
Without their skipper and the Greatest of All Time (yes, greater than Leigh Matthews) Gary Ablett, who is out for the season, Gold Coast dropped their game at the former Bundaberg Rum stadium to the Bulldogs. The loss of an all-time great does not mean as much in Australian Rules football as, say, basketball (more on that in a couple of days); Geelong for example survived the loss of the G.O.A.T. to win another premiership in 2011. But given that Ablett’s replacement was Matt Shaw, a player that is about two-fifths as productive if you take the SuperCoach scores as your metric, the Suns might be expected to slip back a few spots. Which admittedly did not prevent me from tipping them this weekend; perhaps I should have given the effect of Ablett’s absence as much consideration as I have here.
The Sydney Swans won their twelfth game in a row on Saturday night, giving them their equal longest winning streak ever, and easily their longest since the ‘Foreign Legion’ was decimating teams out at the Lake Oval in the 1930s. More importantly, I am sure, they are now the number one ranked team! As mentioned last week the Swans do not have the best average net margin in the league over their past 22 games, though it was boosted somewhat by showing Carlton who their daddy was on the weekend. But Sydney’s recent form shines – their net margin over the first 10 of those games was a mediocre -8; over their past 12 games: +42.
FALLING DOWN
Collingwood fans are now starting to worry that their team will miss the finals, and the rankings now show that the Pies are outside the eight best teams. This is not unprecedented in the four-year history of these rankings – Collingwood slipped to ninth in Round 14 last year – but it is a rarity. They have now lost over two goals worth of ranking points in the past five weeks. What may end up saving the Carringbush from an early off-season is that the team mentioned below looks like they could be in trouble as well.
ALSO OF NOTE
Without their skipper and the Greatest of All Time (yes, greater than Leigh Matthews) Gary Ablett, who is out for the season, Gold Coast dropped their game at the former Bundaberg Rum stadium to the Bulldogs. The loss of an all-time great does not mean as much in Australian Rules football as, say, basketball (more on that in a couple of days); Geelong for example survived the loss of the G.O.A.T. to win another premiership in 2011. But given that Ablett’s replacement was Matt Shaw, a player that is about two-fifths as productive if you take the SuperCoach scores as your metric, the Suns might be expected to slip back a few spots. Which admittedly did not prevent me from tipping them this weekend; perhaps I should have given the effect of Ablett’s absence as much consideration as I have here.
Saturday, July 12, 2014
The Finger Points Outwards - No. 85
BOOKS: Which
of this year’s bestselling books are least likely to have actually been read?
I am 25% of the way through the least likely, and it is indeed a laborious
endeavour. The style is easy enough to read, but does he really need 700 pages
to make his points?
FOOTBALL: The Sensitive Artist’s Guide to the World Cup. Unfortunately for modern-day sensitive artists, Socrates retired twenty-five years ago.
CULTURE/HUMOUR: Australians at Buzzfeed Oz answer their American colleagues’ questions about their country. My wife shed tears of laughter over the responses regarding our dangerous snakes and dingoes.
CRICKET: Do catches win cricket matches? I will have something to say about this topic here soon.
ART: 18 empowering illustrations from a Brazilian graphic designer about women’s bodily autonomy.
FOOTBALL: The Sensitive Artist’s Guide to the World Cup. Unfortunately for modern-day sensitive artists, Socrates retired twenty-five years ago.
CULTURE/HUMOUR: Australians at Buzzfeed Oz answer their American colleagues’ questions about their country. My wife shed tears of laughter over the responses regarding our dangerous snakes and dingoes.
CRICKET: Do catches win cricket matches? I will have something to say about this topic here soon.
ART: 18 empowering illustrations from a Brazilian graphic designer about women’s bodily autonomy.
Tuesday, July 8, 2014
BEER!![15] – Rogue Beard Beer
Brewery: Rogue
Place Of Origin: Oregon
Type: Beer of El Beardo. Brewed with a yeast created from Rogue Brewmaster John Maier’s beard. Did I mention the Rogue brewery is in Oregon?
Alcohol Content: 5.6% ABV. As in Added Beard Volume.
Why I Bought It: When am I going to buy a drink made from facial trimmings again? Particularly since this beer is a one-time brew, at least for now.
Taste: Oh it’s just an ale. You won’t be spitting out barber shop clippings or anything. I am more at risk of that from my regular Coopers beer that I get with my haircut at Dr. Follicles. (Important note to authorities – this is an exaggeration; never take away my beer at Dr. Follicles.)
What I did while drinking it: I could say I listened to Adelaide band The Beards. Drank to ‘Got Me A Beard’, ‘Beard Revolution’, and ‘If Your Dad Doesn’t Have A Beard, You’ve Got Two Mums’. But that would be a hairy-faced lie. (I listened to Nirvana’s ‘Bleach’. But hey, I’m seeing The Beards at 170 Russell in Melbourne this month.)
What I did after drinking it: Got in some stubble-stroking by watching the second season of ‘House of Cards’. Francis Underwood, you magnificent clean-faced bastard.
Sunday, July 6, 2014
AFL Power Rankings: Round 16 2014
RISING UP
It’s Essendon this week. Time was that a win over Port Power, even in Adelaide, was not considered to be all that much, but not in 2014 where the Power’s strong form – particularly at home – has led to Adelaide Oval being dubbed the ‘Portress’. But the Bombers broke through there with a two-point victory on the weekend; even if Port had kicked another goal to steal the win the Bombers’ strong showing would have been enough to see them jump from twelfth to tenth. And reflecting that we are getting to the time of year where the AFL ladder and rankings start to reflect each other, that is where they sit on the ladder as well.
FALLING DOWN
No team significantly fell down the ranking spots this week. But St. Kilda’s stature – or what is left of it – deteriorated further, after they lost heavily to Carlton, who are in no great shape themselves. Since the start of the 2013 season the Saints have lost over 65 ranking points – about the equivalent of the difference between Sydney and GWS – and have dropped in the rankings from sixth to last. Even Lucifer and his rebel angels barely fell so far and fast.
ALSO OF NOTE
Sydney is now on top of the AFL ladder, but Hawthorn is still just holding them off the top of the rankings here. The Swans’ average net margin over their past 22 games is +15 points, putting them in the realm of Port Adelaide (+17), and North Melbourne and Collingwood (both +13), and well below Hawthorn (+31) and Fremantle (+27). But the strength of Sydney’s recent form puts them up with the Hawks and Dockers as the teams rated most likely to take out the flag in 2014.
It’s Essendon this week. Time was that a win over Port Power, even in Adelaide, was not considered to be all that much, but not in 2014 where the Power’s strong form – particularly at home – has led to Adelaide Oval being dubbed the ‘Portress’. But the Bombers broke through there with a two-point victory on the weekend; even if Port had kicked another goal to steal the win the Bombers’ strong showing would have been enough to see them jump from twelfth to tenth. And reflecting that we are getting to the time of year where the AFL ladder and rankings start to reflect each other, that is where they sit on the ladder as well.
FALLING DOWN
No team significantly fell down the ranking spots this week. But St. Kilda’s stature – or what is left of it – deteriorated further, after they lost heavily to Carlton, who are in no great shape themselves. Since the start of the 2013 season the Saints have lost over 65 ranking points – about the equivalent of the difference between Sydney and GWS – and have dropped in the rankings from sixth to last. Even Lucifer and his rebel angels barely fell so far and fast.
ALSO OF NOTE
Sydney is now on top of the AFL ladder, but Hawthorn is still just holding them off the top of the rankings here. The Swans’ average net margin over their past 22 games is +15 points, putting them in the realm of Port Adelaide (+17), and North Melbourne and Collingwood (both +13), and well below Hawthorn (+31) and Fremantle (+27). But the strength of Sydney’s recent form puts them up with the Hawks and Dockers as the teams rated most likely to take out the flag in 2014.
Thursday, July 3, 2014
Graphs of Marvel Comics’ Bizarre Numbering Systems
When I was a kid, two of the first four comics I had were
Spider-Man comics. One of them was ‘Amazing Spider-Man’, it was issue number
270, and it was copyright 1985. The other was ‘Peter Parker, The Spectacular
Spider-Man’, it was issue number 113, and it was copyright 1986. Realising that
the second issue must have been released at a later date, and not realising
that they were two different Spider-Man series, I postulated that the issue
numbers of comics were chosen at random. I knew that series began at issue #1, and
I was sure #2 followed, but it seemed to me then that you could choose whatever
numbers you wanted after #3 – eg #1, #2, #3, #57, #629, #188, #270, #113 ...
I may have been wrong then, but given Marvel Comics’ numbering systems in recent years, my theory could be argued to be somewhat ahead of its time. Since the mid-1990s Marvel has frequently, often bafflingly, re-numbered its long-running series. Below are attempts to chart those numbering systems for some of their series, graphing number of issues (in sequential order) against issue number.
Start with ‘Amazing Spider-Man’ – it may seem tricky, but compared to other series its numbering system has been generally straightforward. For over 400 issues (starting from point A in the chart below) there was a long steady climb, where its issue number matched its number of issues. The series then underwent a ‘relaunch’ in the mid-1990s (B), a word I heartily detest – I find the concept itself pretty stupid too. Even this though did not shake the seemingly incontrovertible law that issue numbers for comic series ran in sequence.
The trouble kind of started when Marvel Editor in Chief Joe
Quesada decided that he disliked the renumbering of all of Marvel’s
long-running series. Consequently, these series started to have dual
numbers (C) – one signalling where the issue was situated in the current
series, and the other signalling what number the issue would be if the series
have never been stupidly relaunched. However, the first of these numbers
magically disappeared when the count for the second number allowed Marvel to
publish an oversized, higher-priced 500th ‘anniversary’ issue.
The
LSC was then resumed as if it never halted, until Jonathan Hickman ‘killed’ off
the Human Torch, and the title was relaunched as ‘FF’ rather than FF (F). But
then lo and behold, an ‘anniversary’ issue came up, and Marvel wanted to have
its cake and eat it too. ‘FF’ #12 was instead ‘Fantastic Four’ #600, with ‘FF’
#1-11 retroactively becoming the missing issues of ‘Fantastic Four’ (G). After
that Marvel pulled a Captain
Kirk, where ‘Fantastic Four’ (#601- ) and ‘FF’ (#12- ) both existed
simultaneously. Both series were then started again as part of the Marvel NOW!
Relaunch Hyperoverload (H), catapulting the series into a bold new era that managed
to last a whole sixteen issues (I).
The 600th issue (F) was Marvel’s
chance for a have-your-cake-and-eat-it, even though it was not the 600th
issue of Thor at all. It only works if you count the first 125 issues of
‘Journey Into Mystery’, but not the issues after the first Captain Kirk,
because well … that would not have added up to 600, would it? This resumption
of the LSC did not last long until a second Captain Kirk occurred (G), where
‘Thor’ began again at #1 (H), and ‘Journey Into Mystery’ again took over the
old numbering. ‘Thor: God of Thunder’ is the most recent stupid relaunch (I),
although it is enough of a clean break from what came before that it can almost
be forgiven.
You would think that with so many stupid
relaunches it would never regain its former heights on the y-axis. But never
underestimate the power of Marvel’s have-your-cake-and-eat-it fetish, which took
effect as of issue number, wait for it … the oversized, higher-priced 600 (F). (Though
like ‘Thor’ this ignores that the series began at #100.) Captain America then
got Captain Kirked not long after, when Captain America got ‘killed’ and was
replaced, albeit by the original Captain America Steve Rogers, who himself had
been ‘killed’ and replaced. ‘Captain America’ and ‘Captain America and Bucky’,
which picked up the old numbering, then ran simultaneously (H and I), with the
good Captain getting Marvel NOW!ed accounting for the most recent relaunch (J).
At the same time as ‘Iron Man’ was running, a new title
called ‘Invincible Iron Man’ was launched (F). Eventually ‘Iron Man’ was
cancelled, and ‘Invincible Iron Man’ became the Iron Man title (G). Which would
have been relatively straightforward as far as these things go until the
‘have-your-cake-and-eat-it’ phenomenon struck, and ‘Invincible Iron Man’ was
renumbered, with #34 becoming #500 (H). Essays could have been written about
how the hell the various Iron Man issues added up to #500; however the website
Comic Book Numbering worked out the magic
algebra that made it work (hint: three issues of ‘Iron Man’ were apparently
not ‘Iron Man’ issues at all).
Well, I hope all of those charts explained things. Now you can sit back and wait for Marvel’s new films Avengers 7, Captain America XL, and Guardians of the Galaxy 462.3, coming soon to a multiplex near you.
I may have been wrong then, but given Marvel Comics’ numbering systems in recent years, my theory could be argued to be somewhat ahead of its time. Since the mid-1990s Marvel has frequently, often bafflingly, re-numbered its long-running series. Below are attempts to chart those numbering systems for some of their series, graphing number of issues (in sequential order) against issue number.
Start with ‘Amazing Spider-Man’ – it may seem tricky, but compared to other series its numbering system has been generally straightforward. For over 400 issues (starting from point A in the chart below) there was a long steady climb, where its issue number matched its number of issues. The series then underwent a ‘relaunch’ in the mid-1990s (B), a word I heartily detest – I find the concept itself pretty stupid too. Even this though did not shake the seemingly incontrovertible law that issue numbers for comic series ran in sequence.
The numbering then returned to the path that the long steady climb would have taken if it had not been interrupted only marginally thrown off-course by some ‘Point One’ issues – eg #654.1 – barely perceptible on the graph below. This continued until the ‘final’ issue, #700, in which Peter Parker was ‘killed’ and replaced. (Actually there were also issues #700.1-700.5 but never mind that … ) ‘Amazing’ was then replaced by ‘Superior Spider-Man’ but that was then replaced by another stupid relaunch of ‘Amazing’ this year, with Peter Parker returning (D). Therefore, ‘Amazing Spider-Man’, despite running for over 700 issues, is now essentially back at the start again …
Next up: Marvel’s other flagship title ‘Fantastic Four’.
This also had an LSC for over 400 issues (A), before it was stupidly relaunched,
or ‘reborned’ if you will, as part of Marvel’s first stab at renumbering its
popular, long-running series – the ‘Heroes Reborn’ debacle (B).
After ‘Reborn’ divebombed, there was another relaunch under the ‘Heroes Return’
banner (C). The series would then later undergo the same dual numbering phenomenon
as ‘Amazing Spider-Man’ (D), although in the FF’s case it lasted a little
beyond #500, with the wrinkle that the numbers did a switcheroo from #501
onwards so that the higher number came first (E).
Marvel’s ‘Thor’ aka ’The Mighty Thor’ aka ’Thor: God of
Thunder’ actually began life as a re-titling of ‘Journey Into Mystery’, so that
its first issue was #126 (A). Since then its numbering has been affected by
several stupid relaunches, a have-your-cake-and-eat-it, and a double Captain
Kirk. The title ‘Thor’ was initially cancelled rather than Reborned in the mid-1990s
(it was the lucky one), but the series reverted to its old name of ‘Journey
Into Mystery’ and kept the same numbering sequence (B). The relaunch eventually
came though (C), followed by a dual numbering (D), and then a cancellation and
relaunch again (E).
‘Captain America’ has followed a similar path to ‘Thor’,
beginning at #100 as a re-titling of ‘Tales of Suspense’ (A), and then
undergoing a LSC up past #450. Like ‘Fantastic Four’ it got ‘Reborned’ (B), and
relaunched (C), and then had a dual number for a tick (D), before it got
stupidly relaunched (E) and relaunched again (F).
And then there is Iron Man … take a deep breath now ...
Iron Man’ started at #1 (A), and adhered to the law of the
long, steady climb for over 300 issues. It was ‘Reborned’ (B), and stupidly
relaunched (C), and dual numbered (D) like the other titles we have seen here. And
like ‘Captain America’ it was then stupidly relaunched again (E). Alright, this
is where it gets hairy …
Well, I hope all of those charts explained things. Now you can sit back and wait for Marvel’s new films Avengers 7, Captain America XL, and Guardians of the Galaxy 462.3, coming soon to a multiplex near you.