The difference
in points is so tight in the middle of the rankings that North Melbourne drops
a couple of spots even though it did not play this week. The Kangaroos’ slight
fall in points is mainly a result of one of their recent opponents, Sydney, not
being rated as highly this week after its loss at home to Richmond. Meanwhile
Collingwood moves up a few spots after a good performance in Perth against
Fremantle, giving the Magpies the highest total gain of any team this season.
The five teams ranked from sixth to tenth – Port Adelaide, Collingwood, North
Melbourne, Geelong, and Adelaide – are separated by less than two ranking
points, or less than a tenth of a point per game over the course of a season.
Richmond consolidates fifth position with the
highest gain of any team over the past five weeks, playing into my fear that
fifth will be the new ninth for the Tigers. That is, in the same way that
Richmond just missed out on the final eight several times over the past twenty
years I fear that it will start a run of just missing out on the top four, as
it already did in 2013. Honestly though, given that the Tigers started off the
season 2-4 - coupled with them not playing many finals in the past thirty years
- I would still be pretty pleased if they could just make the bottom four of
the top eight for a third straight year.
Sunday, June 28, 2015
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
The Greatest VFL/AFL Dynasty
Recently I
mused on this blog about where the current Geelong team ranked
among the great VFL/AFL dynasties. This was in part inspired by a recent Fivethirtyeight article about the
greatest of the NBA dynasties, which in the author’s view was Tim Duncan’s Spurs. This
choice was based on the Spurs remaining well above average for 17 years … and
counting.
In my earlier blog post I said that if the strength of a dynasty is determined by how long and how far a team is above a particular benchmark then I could think of at least four ‘dynasties’ in VFL/AFL history that may be considered the competition’s greatest. However, when I went back and looked at the great eras in more detail, one of those eras, in my view, stood well above the rest.
First, my two ‘runner-up dynasties’:
Even more astonishingly the Magpies did not have a losing season from the VFL’s inception in 1897 up until 1940! The legendary Jock McHale coached them for all six of those flags in the 1920s and 1930s, plus another in 1919, and was at the helm for nearly four decades. Adding to their dynastic credentials is that four of their best players were two sets of brothers, the Colliers (Albert and Harry), and the Coventrys (Gordon and Syd). Now that’s a dynasty. The current Geelong team needs to be contending right up to 2020 for it to match an era like that.
In my earlier blog post I said that if the strength of a dynasty is determined by how long and how far a team is above a particular benchmark then I could think of at least four ‘dynasties’ in VFL/AFL history that may be considered the competition’s greatest. However, when I went back and looked at the great eras in more detail, one of those eras, in my view, stood well above the rest.
First, my two ‘runner-up dynasties’:
·
Melbourne
1954-1964: The Demons won 75 per cent of their matches, won six premierships,
contested eight Grand Finals, and won seven minor premierships.
·
Hawthorn
1982-1994: The Hawks won 72 per cent of their matches, won five premierships, contested
eight Grand Finals, and won three minor premierships.
As good as
these eras were though I don’t think they compare with the Collingwood team of
1925-1939. The Magpies won about 75 per cent of their matches over a fifteen-year
period. They won six premierships, five minor premierships, and contested an
amazing 11 Grand Finals. Their winning percentage was boosted a bit by the
addition of three new teams in 1925 that were poor for much of that time, but it
is still a great achievement to get to the pointy end of the season that many
times. A lot of football followers know about the famous four premierships in a
row from 1927 to 1930. Fewer may remember that Collingwood also won the 1935
and 1936 flags, and were runners-up from 1937 to 1939.Even more astonishingly the Magpies did not have a losing season from the VFL’s inception in 1897 up until 1940! The legendary Jock McHale coached them for all six of those flags in the 1920s and 1930s, plus another in 1919, and was at the helm for nearly four decades. Adding to their dynastic credentials is that four of their best players were two sets of brothers, the Colliers (Albert and Harry), and the Coventrys (Gordon and Syd). Now that’s a dynasty. The current Geelong team needs to be contending right up to 2020 for it to match an era like that.
Sunday, June 21, 2015
AFL Power Rankings: Round 12 2015
Just
as I
was talking about Geelong’s dynasty, the Cats go and lose to Melbourne at
home, which is a bit of a blow to both their finals chances and their ranking. Perhaps
the Cats contracted a similar jinx to what Greater Western Sydney did after I
started highlighting their improvement a few weeks back. Meanwhile North
Melbourne moves up four spots to sixth after its big win over the Giants, which
despite GWS taking a backward step in the past few weeks, still means a lot
more than it used to. Finally Port Adelaide does not fall further this week in
terms of ranking spots, but it is not looking great for the Power, who have
lost to both Carlton and Brisbane in the past five weeks.
Saturday, June 20, 2015
Reflecting on the Career of Chris Judd
This month
Carlton player, and former West Coast player, Chris
Judd retired from AFL after sustaining a serious injury. For me though the
version of Chris Judd I will most remember finished up about eight years ago. That
was the younger version, still with hair, that played with the West Coast
Eagles from 2002 to 2007. From his first year Judd was an explosive midfielder that
seemed like he was a good few inches taller than the opponents he was sprinting
away from.
He won a Brownlow Medal in 2004, captained the Eagles in their premiership win in 2005, and was the consensus best player in the game in 2006. Then Gary Ablett Jr. took over at the best player from 2007 up until last year, and Judd was never really on top again, despite another Brownlow win in 2010. Injuries started to hit Judd before he left the Eagles at the end of 2007. While he certainly was valuable for the Blues in his time there, he was too hobbled to be seen as invincible.
But the 2004-2007 version of Chris Judd was one of the best players I have ever seen, and would be worthy of a spot in an all-time AFL team (even if I have said before I would probably leave him out). I rate him below Ablett and slightly below Michael Voss, but ahead of Nathan Buckley and James Hird. Pretty much everyone liked and admired that version of Judd. It was harder for Victorians at least to like him once he joined the Blues, who despite their recent lack of success are still one of the more disliked teams.
And which team won that Judd/Josh Kennedy-No. 3 draft pick trade? At the time I said I expected the Eagles had gotten the better deal, given that Kennedy’s progress to that time suggested he would be a valuable forward for years to come. Turns out I was about right on Judd playing another eight years, although he played a few less games in that time than I expected. I was also pretty much right about the value of Kennedy and the No. 3 draft pick, which ended up being Chris Masten. Still, even if the Eagles did win the trade I doubt too many Carlton officials wish they could have a do-over on it.
He won a Brownlow Medal in 2004, captained the Eagles in their premiership win in 2005, and was the consensus best player in the game in 2006. Then Gary Ablett Jr. took over at the best player from 2007 up until last year, and Judd was never really on top again, despite another Brownlow win in 2010. Injuries started to hit Judd before he left the Eagles at the end of 2007. While he certainly was valuable for the Blues in his time there, he was too hobbled to be seen as invincible.
But the 2004-2007 version of Chris Judd was one of the best players I have ever seen, and would be worthy of a spot in an all-time AFL team (even if I have said before I would probably leave him out). I rate him below Ablett and slightly below Michael Voss, but ahead of Nathan Buckley and James Hird. Pretty much everyone liked and admired that version of Judd. It was harder for Victorians at least to like him once he joined the Blues, who despite their recent lack of success are still one of the more disliked teams.
And which team won that Judd/Josh Kennedy-No. 3 draft pick trade? At the time I said I expected the Eagles had gotten the better deal, given that Kennedy’s progress to that time suggested he would be a valuable forward for years to come. Turns out I was about right on Judd playing another eight years, although he played a few less games in that time than I expected. I was also pretty much right about the value of Kennedy and the No. 3 draft pick, which ended up being Chris Masten. Still, even if the Eagles did win the trade I doubt too many Carlton officials wish they could have a do-over on it.
Thursday, June 18, 2015
State of Origin Crowds at the MCG
Last night, I attended the New South Wales v Queensland State of Origin match at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. Over 90,000 people were there - a new State of Origin record. It was a pretty good match as well, with NSW winning 26-18 to level the series, although it would have been more interesting if Queensland star Greg Inglis' try in the second half had not been disallowed.
What I wanted to write about was the experience of the crowd, which on reflection seemed to me somewhat uncommon, for these reasons:
- State of Origin matches are usually played in either NSW or Queensland, and so the crowd is usually heavily weighted one way or the other. It is only at the Melbourne matches that the support is roughly even. This 'bi-partisan' support made it more like an Australian Football League finals match, except...
-The supporters were divided into distinct 'blue' and 'maroon' zones. AFL matches have their zones, but not as clearly marked as this was. I guess at AFL matches it's not uncommon to go to a big match with a relative or friend who barracks for the opposite team, so you can't be too vicious towards a person you are travelling home with. That was probably less the case here, which brings me to my next point ...
-The two supporter bases really do dislike each other. I don't think I've seen AFL supporter bases, as tribal as they are, be that acrimonious towards each other. Nor cricket supporters, which are typically the only sports I see big matches for at the MCG.
What is equivalent? Events like the FA Cup, and the Super Bowl probably have similar crowds and roughly equal support, but my impression is that they have many attendees who are not heavily invested in the result either way. I suppose there were many Victorians there last night who weren't too worried, though support amongst Victorians did seem to lean towards Queensland, but it certainly didn't feel like an exhibition match. It was certainly different to the mostly one-way support I experience at Melbourne Storm matches. At the risk of sounding like I'm spouting a cliché, there actually is really nothing quite like an Origin match...
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
The Finger Points Outwards - No. 107
TELEVISION: The
20 best scenes from Game of Thrones so far.
FILM: Which movie sequel most ruined its franchise? (Not ‘The Phantom Menace’.)
PARENTING: Comic strips about the reality of parenthood.
ECONOMICS/MINIMUM WAGES: An argument that a higher minimum wage does not complement an earned income tax credit, but undermines it.
BASEBALL: The effects of hurrying up batters on older players, particularly the Red Sox’s Dave Ortiz.
FILM: Which movie sequel most ruined its franchise? (Not ‘The Phantom Menace’.)
PARENTING: Comic strips about the reality of parenthood.
ECONOMICS/MINIMUM WAGES: An argument that a higher minimum wage does not complement an earned income tax credit, but undermines it.
BASEBALL: The effects of hurrying up batters on older players, particularly the Red Sox’s Dave Ortiz.
Labels:
Baseball,
Economics,
Film,
Minimum Wages,
Parenting,
Television,
The Finger Points Outwards
Sunday, June 14, 2015
AFL Power Rankings: Round 11 2015
Pundits have
been proclaiming the end of the ‘Cat Empire’ since at least 2010, and after it
got well done by Hawthorn in the first round I thought this year may be the end of
Geelong’s time amongst the top half of teams. Maybe it still will be but for now Geelong sits
fifth on the rankings, after a bunch of decent performances in recent weeks,
including a win against Port Adelaide away, and wins against Essendon and
Carlton that were big enough to bring heightened media scrutiny upon the
performances of both those clubs.
The Cats are still a fair way from the top four according to these rankings, and on that basis one may say that their dynasty has reached its end. But according to at least one definition of ‘dynasty’, it is probably still going. Fivethirtyeight recently rated the best National Basketball Association dynasties, and defined the strength of a dynasty as how far and how long a team remained above average.
It would be interesting to see which has been the most successful VFL/AFL dynasty on that basis. My guess would be that it would be one of either the 1920s/30s Collingwood, 1950s/60s Melbourne, or 1980s/90s Hawthorn sides, or the current Cats era. Unfortunately I don’t have a long-term ratings system to assess this (although somewhere like the Footy Maths Institute does – how about it, Footy Maths?) I could rate it based on win-loss records and percentages though. Since once I get an idea like this I am usually interested to see the outcome I may well post something on this in the next few weeks.
The Cats are still a fair way from the top four according to these rankings, and on that basis one may say that their dynasty has reached its end. But according to at least one definition of ‘dynasty’, it is probably still going. Fivethirtyeight recently rated the best National Basketball Association dynasties, and defined the strength of a dynasty as how far and how long a team remained above average.
It would be interesting to see which has been the most successful VFL/AFL dynasty on that basis. My guess would be that it would be one of either the 1920s/30s Collingwood, 1950s/60s Melbourne, or 1980s/90s Hawthorn sides, or the current Cats era. Unfortunately I don’t have a long-term ratings system to assess this (although somewhere like the Footy Maths Institute does – how about it, Footy Maths?) I could rate it based on win-loss records and percentages though. Since once I get an idea like this I am usually interested to see the outcome I may well post something on this in the next few weeks.
Monday, June 8, 2015
AFL Power Rankings: Round 10 2015
Ah, the
final mid-season AFL round of full matches … that is, the final round before
many SuperCoach teams are thrown into chaos, and it takes a frustratingly long
time to update my rankings spread sheet because every third team is not
playing.
I particular enjoyed this final mid-season AFL round, as my Tigers continued their good form, becoming the ‘hottest’ team of the past few weeks. Richmond is now in the top six of the rankings, whereas about five rounds ago I would have thought it more likely it would be in the bottom six. The Tigers have played so well interstate against Fremantle this week and Port Adelaide a few weeks ago that perhaps rather than adding 12 points to their net margin when they play interstate I should subtract 12 points instead.
I particular enjoyed this final mid-season AFL round, as my Tigers continued their good form, becoming the ‘hottest’ team of the past few weeks. Richmond is now in the top six of the rankings, whereas about five rounds ago I would have thought it more likely it would be in the bottom six. The Tigers have played so well interstate against Fremantle this week and Port Adelaide a few weeks ago that perhaps rather than adding 12 points to their net margin when they play interstate I should subtract 12 points instead.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

