At this stage of the season (Round 9) they had better records in 2003, 2005, 2006, and 2011. In '06 and '11 though their percentage wasn't too good, indicating they were a crappy team waiting to happen. In 2003 their percentage was alright but not as good as this year.
This leaves 2005. In 2005 the Tigers had won 7 out of 9 games at this stage. However they had also played 6 of the bottom 8 teams. So I think there's a case to say that the 2012 version, which has had a tougher draw, is better. (Although if the 2005 team had not lost probably their best player at the time, Nathan Brown, mid-season they may well have made the top eight.)
No comments:
Post a Comment