Two comic books grabbed a fair
amount of attention last week: DC
Comics’ ‘DC Universe: Rebirth #1’ and Marvel
Comics’ ‘Captain America: Steve Rogers’ #1. Both had controversial endings
that were seen by some as intriguing plot developments, and others as
disrespectful to some of comics’ most revered creators. I basically fall into
the second group. My reasons for being bothered by these comic books are as
follows.
In ‘DC Universe: Rebirth’
#1 the characters from ‘Watchmen’, the classic 1980s comic book series by Alan
Moore and Dave Gibbons, are introduced into DC continuity. I had half a
suspicion that ‘Watchmen’ was being referenced on the first page, due to both
the use of that series’ characteristic nine-panel grid layout, and pictures of
the insides of a watch, an image closely associated with ‘Watchmen’ character
Dr. Manhattan. But it became clear to me only near the end of the issue when
the caption ‘… we’re being watched’ appears above Batman finding the trademark pin
of another major ‘Watchmen’ character, the Comedian, on the wall of the
Batcave.
The issue’s epilogue erases
any remaining doubts, as we get further, more obvious references to Dr.
Manhattan: pictures of Mars – his home for a lot of the ‘Watchmen’ story – and
an excerpt of his dialogue from that series’ final issue. The implication seems
to be that the Doctor has been responsible for the recent, damaging changes in
the DC Universe, taking ten years from some characters, and erasing other
characters entirely.
As a reveal taken in and of
itself it is quite clever. Few would have expected a character from a series that
has heretofore been totally outside of DC continuity to be revealed as the main
threat to DC’s heroes. But the use of the ‘Watchmen’ characters is unsettling to
me for several reasons.
The first is that ‘DC
Universe: Rebirth’ #1 seems to be a criticism of DC’s direction since the
famous and somewhat
disliked ‘New 52’ relaunch. It seems to imply that the DC Universe lost
some important things that made it work when it compressed its timeline
following the ‘New 52’, in particular removing or sidelining some of its popular
‘legacy’ heroes, that is, characters that had taken up the mantle of other
heroes. ‘… There’s something wrong with history. Someone has infected it …’
says one of the most popular of those ‘legacy’ characters, Wally West a.k.a. the
third Flash, who returns in this issue. By revealing this ‘someone’ to be Dr.
Manhattan, ‘Rebirth’ writer and DC Chief Creative Officer Geoff Johns seems to
be implying that what went wrong with the DC relaunch was trying to imitate the
‘grim ‘n’ gritty’ atmosphere of the ‘Watchmen’ series. At worse this could be
seen as blaming Moore and Gibbons for a failed creative direction at DC they
had nothing to do with. On the other hand Johns may not be blaming them at all,
just the creators who tried to imitate them.
But the more troubling aspect
for me is that Alan
Moore has made it abundantly clear that he did not want DC to use the
‘Watchmen’ characters again. Now it may be argued that since DC
already went against Moore’s wishes with their ‘Before Watchmen’ line of comics
a few years back that the horse has already bolted on that one. Nevertheless I
think they used the characters more respectfully in those series compared to
‘Rebirth’. Those series were further exploring the characters, by creators who
admired and respected them. In ‘Rebirth’ they are being primarily used as a
plot device. Dave
Gibbons initially seemed to wish the ‘Before Watchmen’ series success, although
later comments suggested he was dismissive of the project. But
Gibbons’ comments at least point to another somewhat redeeming aspect of
‘Before Watchmen’: like the original series itself it was self-contained, and
you could completely ignore it if you so wished. It is a bit harder to ignore
the re-use of the ‘Watchmen’ characters when they are thrown smack bang into
the middle of DC continuity.
Bringing in these characters
is clearly going against Alan Moore’s wishes. Every decision-maker at DC Comics
must have known this would piss him off. And sure, Moore doesn’t own the
characters, and he would have known there was a risk that DC could do things
following his story that he didn’t like, just like has happened to many other
creators that have done work for either DC or Marvel. But first, all those past wrongs do not make
this right. And second, Moore has made his opinion so well-known that it is
clearly disrespectful to him and his work to use the characters in this way. A
shame, because the rest of the issue was OK.
In ‘Captain
America: Steve Rogers’ #1 one of Marvel’s greatest heroes and ‘boy scouts’ was seemingly revealed as a long-time member of the evil HYDRA organisation. Many
fans are not pleased about this at all, particularly since HYDRA has been closely
associated with Nazis, and Captain America’s creators Jack Kirby and Joe Simon
were both Jewish.
This news was initially tough
for me to take. This is not just a ‘shock’ development to the character: it
seems to go against the very reason the character was created. Cap was created specifically
to fight Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, not to be a double agent for them.
In comics though many of
these types of developments don’t last, and having read the issue now I suspect
even more that it is a red herring. Even if not reversed in the current
storyline there is a good chance that another writer will reverse it down the
track. So perhaps in the end it will be relatively harmless, any injury to the
intentions of Kirby and Simon notwithstanding. That makes it less bothersome to
me than what DC Rebirth has done, although I actually found the latter the much
better story overall. And maybe the DC Rebirth reveal is a red herring as well.
But given DC Comics’ recent track record I don’t hold much hope for that.
No comments:
Post a Comment