If my rankings' predictions were being used on Squiggle, I'd be at the top of the
leaderboard. Just saying guys. :) (Of
course, if they were near the bottom, I'd be dead quiet about that...)
I'll back you on that - I am tracking yours along with Squiggle's set and my own and several others... I've got you at 76 through thirteen rounds, the highest on my board being 77. (My ELO-Following Football rating system's batting 74.) And if Carlton and North had won...
By the way, apologies to anyone for my initial mistake in the rankings for Round 12, caused by my initially entering the margin of Melbourne's loss to Collingwood in the wrong cell. The Round 12 tables are now correct, which for anyone keeping a record, will be why they look different. I don't think it affected any tips.
2 comments:
I'll back you on that - I am tracking yours along with Squiggle's set and my own and several others... I've got you at 76 through thirteen rounds, the highest on my board being 77. (My ELO-Following Football rating system's batting 74.) And if Carlton and North had won...
Thanks for the support!
By the way, apologies to anyone for my initial mistake in the rankings for Round 12, caused by my initially entering the margin of Melbourne's loss to Collingwood in the wrong cell. The Round 12 tables are now correct, which for anyone keeping a record, will be why they look different. I don't think it affected any tips.
Post a Comment