Monday, April 7, 2025
Monday, March 31, 2025
AFL Rankings: Round 3 2025
After three matches, Melbourne are winless, and in
the bottom four. In the rankings, they are in now also in the bottom four. They
have been well beaten in their past two matches by North Melbourne and Gold
Coast. To be fair, they were very competitive in their first match against GWS,
and almost won. Even if they had though, their last two losses would still have
them as a bottom four team.
The decline into ‘bottom four-dom’ started happening
late last season. They lost three of their last six games by more than 45
points, although they were missing one of their best players in Christian
Petracca, and another of their best Clayton Oliver was clearly underdone. And
the steady decline has been going on longer than that.
Melbourne’s premiership team in 2021 and finals
sides after that were built on a strong midfield and a miserly defence. Currently
they have neither. They conceded 120 points to both North Melbourne and Gold
Coast. They had 25 less inside 50s than the Suns.
And they are getting smashed in the clearances. They
were -12 against the Roos, and -16 against the Suns. This is with a midfield
that still includes Max Gawn, Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, and Jack Viney,
even if the midfield group has been expanded a bit more.
Melbourne’s star midfield quartet has had a 20 per cent combined drop-off in their average AFL Player Rating so far this season compared with 2024 (see table below). Gawn, Petracca, and Viney are averaging two less clearances per game. Oliver is averaging three more, but is averaging six clangers and only three inside 50s. What was once the best midfield in the land has been mediocre, no longer able to more than make up for the team’s other deficiencies.
The prospect of them turning it around is looking bleaker. Gawn will turn 34 this year. Jack Viney will turn 31. Petracca and Oliver should be in their prime, but both have had various dramas over the past couple of years. It was the best Demons team in almost six decades, but its time may be coming to an end.
Tuesday, March 25, 2025
AFL Rankings: Round 2 2025
After a disappointing 2024, the Adelaide Crows have
started off 2025 with two massive wins and two massive scores. First, they kicked
21.9 against St. Kilda to win by 63 points, and then on the weekend they amassed
25.11 to beat Essendon by 61 points. It’s an impressive start to say the least,
but how sustainable is it?
As those scorelines indicate, the Crows have been
unusually accurate to start the season. Based on the quality of their shots at
goal, they scored 24 points more than expected against the Saints and 43 points
more than expected against the Bombers.
Still, that is an average expected score of about 115
points, which is nothing to be sneezed at. The Crows are giving themselves
plenty of opportunities to score, averaging 61 inside 50s, 11 more than their
opposition.
What will be interesting to watch is if they can
keep this up without being dominant in the clearances or contested possessions.
They’ve been OK in those areas so far, with a +3 differential in clearances,
and +4 differential in contested possessions across their first two games.
It is in the uncontested game that the Crows have really excelled though. They took 115 uncontested marks against Essendon on the weekend, compared to the Bombers’ 52. This follows up a figure of 92 uncontested marks to 75 against St. Kilda the week before. (The AFL average is 76.) Winning uncontested possessions does not necessarily lead to winning on the scoreboard, but it’s clearly working for the Crows so far this season.
Adelaide were probably better than their win-loss record last year showed, as they won only two (and drew one) out of nine games that were decided by two goals or less. They look to have significantly improved this season. They’re likely not a 20-goal powerhouse each week, but they seem to have the tools to make the finals for the first time under coach Matthew Nicks.
Monday, March 17, 2025
AFL Rankings: Round 1 2025
Three
teams that various pundits can make finals this year, or even challenge for the
flag, had poor performances on the weekend – Carlton, Fremantle, and Port
Adelaide.
Carlton
lost to ‘wooden spoon’ favourites Richmond, after being 41 points ahead. Fremantle
got well beaten at ‘the Cattery’, losing by 13 goals to Geelong. In Ken Hinkley’s
last season as coach, Port Adelaide recorded their worst loss of his tenure, falling
by 91 points to Collingwood.
One of
those losses isn’t quite as bad as it appears, if you can get past the odds
before the game. Carlton were arguably still the ‘better team’ on the night
against Richmond (though the young Tigers, with their efforts to get back and
ahead, were surely deserved winners), with eight more scoring shots, 21 more
contested possessions, and 25 more inside 50s. Even letting the Tigers get so
close though was not a great sign.
Even
aside from the scoring margins Fremantle and Port Adelaide were more soundly
beaten, although against stronger opposition. Fremantle had 12 less inside 50s
and 14 less contested possessions than the Cats, while Port had 17 less inside
50s and only two contested marks against the Pies.
These
were disappointing results, although it is just ‘one game’. The larger point
here however is – why were these teams considered contenders anyway? While it
would be foolish to count anyone completely out in March, none of them were among
the better performed teams last season, and they actually all fell away as the season
went on. Carlton has won only two out of their past ten matches, Fremantle has
lost their past five, and Port Adelaide suffered a big loss in the finals at
home to Geelong before rallying to a close (though impressive) win the next week.
In the rankings, they are in the middle, about dead on average. Certainly things can change over the course of a season, and they could still be premiership contenders. (They could also get worse.) For now though, they seem a fair way off the pace of the competition’s best teams.*
*Watch now as Carlton beat Hawthorn on Thursday night.