Essendon
|
2000
|
96.00
|
Carlton
|
1908
|
95.00
|
Collingwood
|
1929
|
95.00
|
Essendon
|
1950
|
95.00
|
South Melbourne
|
1918
|
93.75
|
Geelong
|
2008
|
92.00
|
Carlton
|
1995
|
92.00
|
Melbourne
|
1956
|
90.00
|
Essendon
|
1962
|
90.00
|
Collingwood
|
1903
|
89.47
|
It seems like a pretty good list – most of the consensus
dominant teams make an appearance, although no Hawthorn team from the ‘80s, or
Brisbane Lions team from the 2000s gets on the list. But maybe some of those
teams just beat up on bad teams all year? Another way to measure a team’s
dominance is to work out how many standard deviations their winning percentage
was above the average (the average is of course 50 per cent). That is, if the
competition is relatively uneven, a high winning percentage still looks
impressive, but slightly less so. Putting aside finals, that gives this table:
Essendon
|
2000
|
2.34
|
Geelong
|
2008
|
2.12
|
Carlton
|
1995
|
2.02
|
Hawthorn
|
1988
|
1.97
|
St. Kilda
|
2009
|
1.94
|
Melbourne
|
1958
|
1.93
|
Carlton
|
1908
|
1.91
|
Hawthorn
|
1989
|
1.85
|
Essendon
|
1950
|
1.85
|
Melbourne
|
1956
|
1.80
|
I like this list, but it has some weaknesses. The main one
is this – in 1929, Collingwood won 100 per cent of their home and away games (they
lost a final, hence why their overall winning percentage was 95 per cent), but
cannot crack the top 10 in the adjusted winning percentage table. Granted, it
looks like the competition was very uneven that year, but what more could the
Magpies do? Another way to look at dominance then is to work out how many standard
deviations their percentage (points scored divided by points conceded) was
above the average. There is no limit to percentage, and I tend to argue that,
while wins and losses are ultimately how a team’s ladder position is decided, a
team’s percentage possibly gives a better indication of how ‘dominant’ they
were. I am not going for raw percentage here, because that would just give a
list of teams from the 1890s/1900s.
The best teams in terms of adjusted percentage are as follows:
Geelong
|
2007
|
2.57
|
Essendon
|
2000
|
2.55
|
Geelong
|
2008
|
2.48
|
Brisbane
|
1999
|
2.47
|
Melbourne
|
1957
|
2.38
|
Carlton
|
1976
|
2.30
|
Hawthorn
|
1988
|
2.29
|
West Coast
|
1991
|
2.23
|
Collingwood
|
1929
|
2.13
|
Carlton
|
1908
|
2.12
|
There are a few ‘oddballs’ on this list, or are there … ?
Perhaps the Brisbane Lions of 1999, which had a very good percentage in an even
year, were really the ‘best’ team of the Lions’ ‘dynasty’ – they only won less
game than the 2001 and 2002 teams, and likely would have won the premiership that
year if not for losing the preliminary final against North Melbourne (assuming
they played Carlton). Geelong in 2007 also appears to be more dominant than
their winning percentage suggested – if a couple of close losses that year were
reversed they would appear in the top list for winning percentage also.
But one team keeps appearing at or near the top – Essendon in
2000. The Bombers also more than doubled their opponents’ scores in the finals,
a feat also achieved by Hawthorn in 1988, Carlton in 1908, and Geelong in 2007,
but not significantly bettered. They may not have gone on to be dominant in
subsequent years, but for me the conclusion looks clear – the Essendon 2000
squad had the most dominant VFL/AFL season ever.
No comments:
Post a Comment