Essendon
may not have been the most inconsistent side in 2018, but they have definitely
tended to have their best performances against the better teams.
It does feel like Essendon has
been the most – or at least one of the most – inconsistent sides in the AFL
this season, doesn’t it? They shocked West Coast in Perth and GWS in Sydney, and
they have also beaten Geelong, Port Adelaide and most recently North Melbourne.
However they have also provided bottom side Carlton with their only win of the
season, and lost to the Western Bulldogs and Fremantle. But have the Bombers actually
been the most inconsistent side of 2018?
Maybe not. If we take the standard deviation
of Essendon’s net margins in 2018, adjusted for home ground advantage and
opponent strength, then the Bombers have only the fourth largest variation in
their performances (see chart below). Melbourne, Carlton, and Adelaide are the
three teams that have a slightly larger variation in their adjusted net
margins.
A particular feature about
Essendon’s inconsistency though is that they’ve done well against the top
teams, and badly against the lower teams. Melbourne’s inconsistency is a result
of them bashing
up on the lower sides, but struggling against the higher ones. Adelaide’s
inconsistency may well be
largely a result of injuries. Of the three most inconsistent sides Carlton’s
performances are the most similar to Essendon’s, in that they did OK against
top sides such as Richmond, Sydney, and West Coast, but lost at home to Gold
Coast and Fremantle. But Carlton still lost the matches they did relatively well in, as they aren’t yet good
enough to win the games where they play relatively well against the good sides.
Essendon can, and six of their
seven wins have come against teams that are above average or at least average (see
chart below). In contrast, three of their losses have come against relatively
bad sides, although their loss against Carlton may have had a fair deal to do with their
inaccuracy in kicking for goals. The stark difference in the Bombers’
performances against the good and bad sides is probably where our feeling of
their inconsistency comes from.
Next week I think I’ll write
about the Age’s Jake
Niall’s claim that Richmond are farther ahead of the second-best team than any
side has been in the past decade. My ranking points above indicate a big
gap between the Tigers and everyone else. Like Niall though I’ll argue that has
as much to do with Richmond lacking a strong rival as the Tigers being a very good
side, and also like Niall that being a very good side doesn’t guarantee a
premiership.
No comments:
Post a Comment