The AFL Women’s competition is
back in 2020 for its fourth season, and so are my team rankings. In this preview post: ranking
the four new teams, the effects of the uneven fixture, and which teams the
rankings think are most likely to make the finals.
Ranking
the new teams
The 2020 AFLW season will be
the first for four teams: Gold Coast, Richmond, St. Kilda, and West Coast.
Their entry has led to another bout of player movement between clubs, including
former Bulldogs captain Katie Brennan becoming the
first captain for the Tigers, and Dana Hooker moving from
Fremantle to cross-town rivals West Coast. How do we rank these
new entrants, and how does this affect the rankings of the ten existing teams?
Well, over the past few years
everyone has had quite a bit of experience trying to figure out how new AFLW
teams may go, including the original eight teams in the league’s inaugural
season. My approach has
been to use the bookmakers’ odds to set the initial rankings
(though I’ve
varied slightly each time in the exact way I’ve used them).
This approach has a few minor
issues: the bookmakers’ odds may also take into account the difficulty of each
team’s fixture – more on that below – which I haven’t tried to separate out. I
also ended up excluding the Adelaide Crows from my regression, as last year
they were such a massive outlier (more on that below as well).
Unsurprisingly three of the
new teams are at long odds for the premiership, with Gold Coast’s odds being
the longest. The exception is Richmond. This could in part be due to bullish
Tiger bettors still basking in the glow of last season’s men’s premiership. Richmond
has stacked its team with big-name forwards, and the AFLW has so far been a
competition dominated more by midfielders. However, rival
AFLW players also believe the Tigers to be the most likely new side to succeed, and
a 30 point win against the Eagles in a practice match doesn’t hurt this view.
I’ve put the Tigers in among
the group of teams underneath Adelaide, with Carlton, Fremantle, the Kangaroos,
and Melbourne (see below). The other new teams I’ve put down with Collingwood,
Geelong – one of the ‘luckiest’ finals sides there ever was, helped by the
AFLW’s conference system – and the Brisbane Lions.
Note: Apart from changing the
rankings to incorporate the new teams, I’ve
also changed the Kangaroos’ home ground ‘disadvantage’ when playing away in
Melbourne, and applied this retrospectively. With the Roos seeming more now
like a part-Melbourne based team, I’ve done away with the disadvantage
entirely, similar to Geelong in the men’s competition (although not the Cats’ women’s
team).
Which
club has the easiest fixture?
Many complaints are made about
the unevenness of the AFL men’s fixture, but its effect pales against that of
the fixture in the women’s league. Unlike the men’s league, AFLW has more teams
than rounds. The league’s administration may have, in theory, made the conferences
more
even this year than last
year.
However, the addition of four new teams, taking the total up to fourteen, means
that each club will not play five other teams at all.
As things sit now, the team
that looks like it will benefit the most from this inequity in the fixture is
the Fremantle Dockers (see table below). Of last year’s top teams the Dockers
do not play Adelaide, the Kangaroos, and of course themselves. In addition, one
of their ‘away’ games is against the Eagles in Perth.
Fremantle gains an estimated goal
per game from the ease of their fixture, or one more expected win. In a season
of eight rounds, that could come in handy when fighting for one of the six
finals spots. Another finals aspirant Melbourne also avoids playing Adelaide,
while Carlton and Richmond are among the eight teams that have to face the
league’s powerhouse.
At the other end, St. Kilda
gets a baptism of fire, playing every highly ranked side other than the
Kangaroos. The Saints also receive only one ‘home’ game against a non-Victorian
club, while they have to travel interstate twice. Of
course, these fixture assessments could look very different once the finals actually
approach.
ACL
(Adelaide Crows ligaments) injuries even up the league
The 2019 AFLW premiers the
Adelaide Crows may have been the most dominant team – men’s or women’s – in the
history of the AFL. After tripping up in their opening match against the
Bulldogs, the Crows got better and better, winning their matches by an average
of 40 points, and their final three matches by an average of nearly ten goals.
In contrast, last year’s men
premiers Richmond finished with a ranking of about five goals. The virtually
all-conquering 2000 Essendon team won their matches by an average of over 50
points, but the average winning margin in the men’s league is around 30 to 40
points. In the AFLW last year it was just over 20 points, and that is with
Adelaide’s thrashings propping it up.
Therefore, as we stand at the
start of the season the Crows are estimated have close to a 100 per cent
chance of winning each home and away match, and about a 90 per cent chance of
winning all eight of them. The bookmakers don’t have Adelaide as being anywhere
near that strong. What the bookmakers know that the rankings do not is that the
Crows have lost both of their co-captains Chelsea Randall and Erin Phillips to
ACL injuries – Randall for the whole season, and Phillips potentially so. Even
aside from those injuries, one may expect Adelaide to regress a little. It is
still a strong team however, led
by All-Australians Ebony Marinoff and Anne Hatchard.
Player movement in the AFLW
has made predictions from past performances fraught so far, but the rankings like
six teams in particular to make this year’s finals. Adelaide, the Kangaroos,
and Richmond (the Tigers based almost entirely on bookmakers’ odds) are
considered the strongest teams in Conference A, while Fremantle, Carlton, and
Melbourne are the favourites to emerge from Conference B. Gold Coast and St.
Kilda are considered the most likely to be at the bottom of their respective
conferences, with the Saints’ tough fixture hurting them.
I’ll be back each week with
more AFLW rankings goodness, hopefully with statistics from the AFL website up and
running again to support my number-crunching. In the meantime, here are the
rankings’ predictions for the first round of matches. (Brisbane’s estimated
probability of winning against Adelaide is actually 0.2 per cent, but for the reasons
above, is likely somewhat underestimated.)
No comments:
Post a Comment